News center
Stay up-to-date on the latest news here.
Home > News > The return period in the United States often takes more than a month. How can cross-border sellers solve their cash flow problems? Return

The return period in the United States often takes more than a month. How can cross-border sellers solve their cash flow problems?
2026-01-19

In the US e-commerce market, returns have become a frequent occurrence. According to statistics from multiple industry organizations, the average return rate for online retail in the US has consistently remained between 15% and 20%, with the scale of returns increasing year by year. For cross-border sellers, the real challenge isn't whether or not there are returns, but rather the excessively long return processing time, which directly hinders cash flow.

 

Many sellers share similar experiences: a single US return order, from the consumer's shipment to final processing, often takes more than a month or even longer. Goods are lost, money isn't returned, inventory and cash are tied up simultaneously, amplifying the pressure on the cash flow.

 

Why are US returns always "a step behind"?

 

The core reason for the long US return cycle lies in the excessively long and fragmented cross-border logistics chain. In the traditional model, returned goods often need to go through multiple stages, including consumer return, cross-border transportation, customs clearance, domestic warehousing, and re-inspection. Delays at any stage lengthen the overall cycle.

 

At the same time, the high cost and unstable schedules of cross-border reverse logistics, coupled with the uncertainty of customs clearance, further amplify the transit time of returned goods. As a result, platform refunds and inventory status confirmations were forced to be delayed, leaving sellers' funds tied up and waiting for the outcome.

 

What does a prolonged return cycle mean for the cash flow?

 

Slow return processing has far more impact than simply "inefficiency."

 

First, cash flow is tied up for an extended period. Before returned goods are signed for and inspected, platforms often cannot confirm refunds, preventing funds from being recovered, while sellers have already borne all costs associated with customer acquisition, fulfillment, and after-sales service.

 

Second, inventory turnover efficiency declines. Returned goods need to be re-warehousing, inspected, and graded before a decision is made on whether to resell them, further lengthening the inventory holding time.

 

More realistically, as the scale of returns continues to expand, this "slow processing" can be amplified into systemic risk, affecting replenishment schedules, advertising spending, and even peak season inventory preparation decisions.

 

The practice of "returning goods to China" is being abandoned by more and more sellers.

 

In the past, many sellers were accustomed to returning all their US returns to China for processing. While this seemed like centralized management, it was fraught with problems: international return shipping costs were high and uncontrollable; processing times were long, resulting in slow cash flow; and goods were completely unusable while in transit.

 

With return rates continuing to rise, the overall cost of this model has become significantly too high. More and more sellers are realizing that instead of letting returned goods circulate repeatedly in the international shipping chain, it's better to process returns locally in the US.

 

US-based return warehouses are becoming a better solution.

 

Handling returns locally in the US significantly shortens the return process: goods can be signed for, inspected, sorted, and processed immediately upon return, eliminating reliance on cross-border repatriation. This means faster refund confirmations, more timely inventory status updates, and a significantly shortened cash flow cycle.

 

It is against this backdrop that professional US return warehouse services are beginning to attract the attention of cross-border sellers.

 

How does U-Speed's US return warehouse help sellers "speed up cash flow"?

 

Addressing the pain points of cross-border sellers regarding return processing times and cash flow, U-Speed has established a return warehouse network across the East and West Coasts of the United States.

 

The East Coast (New Jersey) return warehouse, with a total area of 7,250 square meters, can process over 20,000 returns daily, covering core consumer areas in the eastern and central United States.

 

The West Coast (Los Angeles) return warehouse, also with an area of 7,250 square meters, has a daily processing capacity of over 10,000 items, efficiently handling return demands from the West Coast.

 

Both warehouses are equipped with forklifts, light and heavy-duty shelving, fire protection and monitoring systems, and implement 24-hour security and CCTV management to ensure the safety and traceability of returned goods during local processing.

 

Timeliness and collaboration are key to shortening return processing times.

 

At the execution level, U-Speed improves return processing efficiency through collaboration between its Chinese and American teams. The Chinese return business management team develops unified processes, while the local Chinese team in the United States operates on-site, supported by a professional customer service team, ensuring stable communication and execution.

 

In terms of timeliness, returned goods can receive quality inspection feedback within 2 days of arrival at the warehouse, and the return logistics processing time is 3-5 days, significantly shortening the time required for traditional cross-border returns.

 

Meanwhile, U-Speed offers a service model combining warehousing, drop shipping, and returns, helping sellers reduce the costs of multiple intermediaries and forming a clearer closed-loop local logistics system in the United States.

 

When the return cycle in the United States often stretches to more than a month, the essence of the problem is no longer just "how to process returns," but whether funds can be returned faster. Compared to continuing to bear the high costs and slow return of traditional returns, bringing return processing to the United States is becoming a realistic choice for more and more cross-border sellers.

 

With the scale of returns continuing to expand, whoever can complete return processing faster has more control over the pace of the cash flow.